Back in the
'70's I was in a meeting (how about that for a real attention grabbing
start?). It was about budget problems
(it can only get better). But it related
to computer issues (the real killer line).
There were nearly thirty there, politicians, officers and others.
Of this all
male unhappy band only two of us had "keyboard skills" and the other
was the bloke who was head computer thing.
He had this special building filled with kit tended by specially
selected boffins, all paid large salaries for doing what computer men (men) had
to do.
Of the rest,
one was an FE college principal, who although never having used or been
involved with computers claimed to be expert on the education bit and the
others a couple of bean counters from the Treasurer's who again were not
computer literate but with a passing acquaintance of what was going on.
This was
because the machines in the special place dealt with wages and salaries and a
number of payment systems inward and outward and they were supposed to have a
grasp of the figures.
By accidents
of my personal history I had done work on computer inputs for the University of London and in my Army days
before had used high tech' stuff of that time. At this meeting I was the crazy
zany 70's man with a highly coloured tie, my own personal calculator (shock
horror), hair (long gone) and a Liverpool fan.
The fact that
I did not need to draft documents but could type them straight onto a duplicating
skin was thought to be work of satanic origins.
Also, I was of the view that the computer setup was already badly out of
date, too limited in its functions and needed scrapping.
Also, it was worse. The Principal's ideas were that keyboard
skills were strictly for females doing courses in FE colleges and that computer
training was higher education that the College wanted to beef up the numbers
for next time's salary round.
Any thought
that schools or children might do something was ludicrous. My view that his college was mostly training
people to do jobs that were disappearing and therefore for unemployment and
given the high rate of drop outs needed radical reshaping was unwelcome all
round.
This was
"cuts" to which the answer was that the government would subsidise all those activities which were in
economic decline. Worse was my attitude
that any kid could pick up keyboard skills with a little time and basic
computer work was no big deal.
As you might
guess I lost the battle, made myself unpopular, was alleged to be proposing
cuts that would be embarrassing and inconvenient and was a mad futurist unable
to realise that things needed to be kept much as they were, in the same way at
whatever cost.
A few months
after this experience I was on a visit to an advanced country in Europe when I
was shown into a place with up to date computer facilities for administrative
purposes. It came as a severe shock; the
reality of the new was already far in advance of my own ideas at the time.
So looking at
and listening to all these politicians now, not only do I suspect that they do
not know the half of it but what could be in train in terms of technical,
industrial, financial and other change might be way beyond their understanding.
This is nothing new if you have fifteen minutes, Deep Thought, above
has the answer.
I recall a computer manager in the late seventies who said the Apple II computer was based on calculator technology and wasn't suitable for lab work.
ReplyDeleteHis solution was an IBM machine the size of a wardrobe which never was any good.