Having just
won the London Marathon, must go soon, Chelsea want me in the line up for the
big game against Arsenal. This is a more
factual and likely statement than Cameron's inevitable promise of big efforts
in the first 100 days, that is, if elected.
In the last
100 or so days, add a few, he came up with new ways of dealing with the pension
pots of the pensioners to come. As a
firm believer in the idea of if something can go wrong it will, the article
linked below was interesting.
What seems to
be happening is that the monetary policies being used to deal with current
money problems do not seem to be working at either macro or micro economic
levels.
This informed article in Pensions and Investments, "Monetary
Policy, Its All Relative" hat tip The Automatic Earth, suggests that the
accepted ideas used recently could be having the reverse effects to those
intended for a number of reasons.
It is not a
long article, intricate, but an interesting read, here is a quote:
When baby boomers were in the sweet spot for housing
needs, expenditures on children and cars, etc. 30 to 40 years ago, the effect
the central banks were expecting from QE might have worked better, as they
expected it would, but that need not be a reliable prediction under the changed
current demographic and wealth distribution.
A recent study by the Center for American Progress shows
that millions of Americans (as high as 50% of households) are in danger of
retiring with insufficient money to maintain the standard of living to which
they are accustomed, and the problem is getting progressively worse.
Your previous editorial argues that QE by the central bank
may impose unintended costs on pensions, at both the institutional and retail
level.
Unquote.
It might be
worse again in the UK and Europe.
Maybe children will need to learn skills which are more relevant to the modern world - such as forgery and hacking.
ReplyDelete