Among the many
talents I have failed to obtain, art is one of them. Also, it was a field foreign to me for many
years, but later in life wandering around old buildings and tourist locations
an interest began to form, born out of an interest in history and human
progress, or lack of it.
A result is an
interest in the TV programmes on the subject and some reading and
visiting. It was impossible not to
wander around France and some other places without picking up a good deal of
information.
When TV Sky
Arts One put on the programmes "Portrait Artist of the Year",
it was something to watch, easy to follow and better than the options. One can have enough of mid week lower
division soccer or crash bang drama or the endless repeat of documentaries.
Broadly, the
world of British art today is extensive, complicated and with many schools of
activity. There are many and various
deep divisions of thinking and belief on the all the forms and variations in
this field. Necessarily any TV programme
has to cut to the chase whatever the chosen area might be.
By concentrating
on a limited field, portraiture and with a clear structure it was intended for
a more popular audience. Personally, I
could have managed without the knockout levels and the blather that went on
with it, but it was meant to catch an audience for whom this would add
interest.
There
are three, not distinct, groups in this field as whole. One is those who are at the top, exhibiting
in major galleries and moving their works in the market. Second, there are those engaged in the art
world as practitioners at lower levels, teachers or such as well as working on
their own account.
Thirdly, there
are many with talent and interest for whom art is a major part of their lives,
but who need to work to live and provide the money for their interest. In the earlier series it was my impression
that it was aimed at finding major talent in the second and third groupings.
This year, 2014,
however, it emerged that the winner was already represented by a major London
gallery and said to have works that could be moved and for whom there was a
market able to pay the price. In other
words he had "made it" and was already in favour.
Sadly, life's
experience has not only given me cynicism but a habit of thought to look behind
the noise for things which do not quite seem to fit and the inexplicable. In the various rounds I had wondered about some of the reasoning.
In the final
programme where the winner then painted a famous actor as a commission for a
national gallery I had the distinct impression that the presenters and judges
all had been given a script to stick to.
The result of the 2014 series, in my view and purely personal opinion, was pre-determined.
The result of the 2014 series, in my view and purely personal opinion, was pre-determined.
If Sky want to
promote the work of selected artists and send a message out to all of us would
they just do programmes that do that.
I have a rule where nothing I see on TV is treated as trustworthy unless confirmed by other sources.
ReplyDeleteYears ago I would have taken factual TV at face value, but not now.