The fuss at
the moment about what is in food that should not be is old news with a new
twist. Adulteration of food and food
products has been with us down the ages ever since people needed to source food
supplies from others on a regular basis.
For about twenty
years of his life my father was a butcher and in the age before refrigeration
or freezing become the norm. Their
problem was that if the fresh meat had not sold then how it was to be kept
looking and seeming fresh.
The answer
was found in the basement barrels where the meats were steeped in various
concoctions to make them last. With a
bit of a wash and the application of one thing or another it went on the slab
as the cheaper cuts.
So the
trick for shoppers was to find a good butcher and for that matter a good grocer
and greengrocer who could be relied on not to go to the extremes of this kind
of thing and where you were sure of the product and its sourcing.
But
retailing has changed a great deal as has the sourcing and distribution. It is all very well calling for regulations
and inspections but without a draconian and extensive regime the term “caveat
emptor” still applies. Also big
suppliers who are members of big marketing organisations have big political
clout.
More to the
point the shoppers, beguiled by modern marketing and packaging is more trusting
and now innocent to the point of ignorance.
We live in a world of apparently perfect shapes and colours in food and
a taste that is always exactly the same.
Once in a
pub which prided itself on making its own ice cream from real contents I recall
one customer complaining loudly that the fresh orange ice cream of the day
slightly differed from one the month before.
The
expectation of sameness and absolute identity of texture, colour, taste and
shape is now part of most peoples shopping psyche. There cannot and must not be any deviation
from one season or year to another.
Zero Hedge
has an interesting one today with some links to add to the point:
Another
media story was that apparently our government wants to opt out of some EU food
regulations. One effect is that “mince”
which should have at least 53% of the meat claimed might have in fact less than
half, the remainder made up of “connective tissue” or fats or other items.
Something
which is less commented on is the increasing armoury of substances packed in as
filling, cosmetic effects and taste balancing etc. the great majority of which
are synthetic chemicals derived from petroleum.
What is
scary is that we could soon have two generations fed on foods of this kind and
without any concept of what might be called basic or real eating patterns or
provision, never mind how to handle them.
Also, they will be subject to their suppliers and not those who make the
real choices.
The meals
will not be eaten at table, but probably on the lap out of the microwave while
watching high cuisine cooking on TV.
No comments:
Post a Comment