The first
time I watched TV was on Saturday, 29th April 1950. A small number of us were gathered together
by special invitation in the living room of our corner newsagent in front of
his new very expensive TV set. When the
band struck up the national anthem, some of us stood so the rest felt obliged
to.
It did seem
odd to me, a Mr. Awkward teenager to do this in a domestic place when the band
was just on screen, but these were the days when in a cinema at the end of the
evening the anthem also would be played.
You had to be out fast because if stuck you would be at the back of the
tram queue going home.
But it was
the Cup Final, then an event which the media and the BBC had accorded being of
the first importance in that the King was there, probably bored stiff, and
sitting in an old garden chair in the Royal Box (been there done that rather
later) watching Arsenal and Liverpool fight it out in the fullest sense of the
term.
This was
when my mistrust of TV was first born.
Having been to quite a few football matches in several stadia already it
seemed that the relentlessly bossy commentator was mostly talking
nonsense. Things that were obvious he
shouted at us, things that were not obvious or subtle were wholly lost to him.
Between
then and the mid 1980’s not a lot of TV was watched and there were long periods
when TV was just not there. I can barely
remember what was being screened apart from a very small number. It is not surprising because having thumbed
through a few old Radio Times for the period a lot of it was drivel and much of
little interest.
Sport was
the main one. The rugby internationals were a must, mercifully mostly done by
Bill Mclaren and the soccer that did find its way onto the screen. For the soccer, the commentators were the usual
again bossy superficial presenters in the way that characterised so much of BBC
output.
Of the
rest, there was a feeling that the news might be watched and some of the
political programmes. In the context of
the questions arising about Jimmy Savile and the BBC, before he lurched onto
the radio waves and screen we had Lord Boothby.
Amongst the
many gruesome specimens offered to us by the BBC as people to be admired and
listened to he was one of the foremost.
He was presented to us as a man of discernment and culture who might
guide us in our thinking about higher things.
When he
fervently recommended the Red Army Choir and Dancers to us all, this made me
suspect that he was a bit of a Red.
Rather later, I realised that there may have been other attractions.
Boothby, now
famously revealed, ran with the Kray Brothers East End gangsters, was provided
with rent boys by them and cuckolded Harold Macmillan, the then Prime Minister.
He was just
the man for the BBC to advise us on the ethics and morals of modern life at the
time. Another man favoured by the BBC as
a potential leader of the Labour Party was someone called John Stonehouse, 1925
to 1988, see Wikipedia for his strange tale.
In 1958, in
company with a few others, I saw him talk in a private meeting and we concluded
without disagreement that he was a “wrong ‘un”.
Quite how he then went through a spell of being a man of the future is
baffling.
But then we
had Edward Heath presented to us a man of decision who could be trusted. Harold Wilson, doing his latter day JB
Priestley political tribute act was supposed to be the intellectual expert who
really knew his economics.
That was
the BBC and given its craven attitude to and unquestioning support for bossy
exhibitionist arrogant shysters over decades the Savile business is simply par
for the course only we now know a great deal nastier.
But we all
paid our licence fees and many watched and believed. In the 1950’s the Labour Party was almost all
opposed to any commercial TV or choice of channels other than the BBC. Later, there was strong Left Wing opposition
to Sky and the much wider choice of channels.
Amongst the
“what if’s” of UK media history is what might have happened if Lord Home had
won the 1964 election and his government then opted for multi-channel
competitive TV while scrapping the license fee for the BBC.
But the BBC
was largely responsible for scuppering Lord Home’s chances by running
programmes which were not simply critical but mocking in a way that showed
flagrant bias.
It had
become too big to fail.
"That was the BBC and given its craven attitude to and unquestioning support for bossy exhibitionist arrogant shysters over decades the Savile business is simply par for the course only we now know a great deal nastier."
ReplyDeleteGreat post. Too many were taken in by the BBC. I was on the whole - or at least I assumed it was more well-intentioned than it ever was.