A few years
ago, with time in hand, decided to take a look at the Lord Chamberlains
documents, The Censor, from the 1940’s to see what there was in some of the
acts I had seen live on stage in our local variety hall.
In those
days the scripts for comedy sketches and acts had to be cleared with the
Censor. Also, if the local police were
not too busy a plain clothes constable might be in the audience making notes to
see if there had been any deviation from what had been authorised.
Max Miller,
then a major celebrity and comedian with a reputation for ad-libbing and near
the knuckle humour turned this to his advantage sometimes by telling the
audience that he was going to disappoint them because that big bloke at the
back was checking on his performance.
Then he
went on to advise them of the jokes cut in such a way that little was left to
the imagination, which both pleased the audience and made any prosecution
liable to difficulties if the case appeared in court. The publicity gained would mean full houses
for months afterwards.
He was not
alone and part of the game between the performers, their audience and The Law
was to see how far it could be taken.
There was a lot of subtlety and play on words that is now lost to us.
The script
of one show turned up which raised memories.
It was called “Soldiers in Skirts” and my parents went to see it having been told it
was made up of females who had served either in the armed forces or in
entertainment for the troops.
In fact they
had been taken in because it was a series of rabid drag acts, all male, mostly excruciating. While verbally “clean” the extremes of dress
and kind of stage business left nothing to the imagination. Despite many complaints the Censors left it
untouched.
A drag act
is one thing, but over two noisy screeching hours of it without relief quite
another. My parents were not happy and nor
were a lot of other people. I have never
wanted to see another drag act again.
However,
amongst the performers were the comedians Morecambe and Wise, before they took
those names. In all the many programmes
about them etc. this is one show that seems to be missing. It is not difficult to understand why.
It is
always interesting to see what else is missing.
A key feature of the Censorship was a rigorous and detailed control over
anything suggestive of sex of any kind.
But in scripts after 1945 despite the horrors of the death camps and The
Holocaust, anti-Jewish jokes, a staple of many routines, were passed without
note or comment.
How odd it
seems now, careful highly educated men picking their way through pages and
pages of drivel to strike this out and that and all the while when on stage
whatever was said was one thing but the way it was said and the stage business
was quite another.
It wasn’t
as though this was anything new. Marie
Lloyd apparently thirty odd years before had demonstrated in court when up on a
charge for being off script that there was more than one way to put a song
over. The normally staid “Come into the
garden Maude” could be gentile or downright ripe with a few winks and gestures.
But the
world has changed and while it is said that political correctness etc. has gone
too far in curbing ordinary banter etc. at the same time it is becoming
impossible to avoid the sex.
It has now
becoming almost compulsory irrespective of having much to do with either the
plot or telling the story. Despite all
the theoretical freedom, it seems that a great deal of contemporary media
entertainment is now far more restricted, narrower in scope and the real humour
lost.
Tell you a
story……………..
I agree. We seem to be losing the subtle arts of hinting which allows people to draw their own conclusions or see the joke in their own way.
ReplyDelete