With it
being fifty years since the James Bond films began and The Beatles emerged from
their Cavern in Liverpool we are being treated again to the Babyboomer BBC etc.
hype about how this and related pop 1960’s pop music completely changed Britain
in 1962 to become a fair, fun loving and less class ridden society and all
that.
It may have
done for the London
media minority but for the great majority of the rest of it didn’t. I was there
as a young family man with a mortgage, a job and at least some hope for a
future, atom bombs or no atom bombs.
As far as I
and my lot were concerned there was a seamless transition from the world of the
1920’s and 1930’s to the one that was emerging.
One key reason for all this was the BBC and other media at the
time.
When the
Conservative government of the 1950’s allowed ITV to go into business it meant
that we had two channels instead of one and the second was commercial. If it pulled in the viewers it would succeed,
if it didn’t it might fail.
By the beginning
of the 1960’s the BBC viewing figures were in free fall and by now there were
enough TV sets around to impact on radio listening as well. The Light Programme and Home Service had a
variety of listening at differing levels.
The Third
Programme was hard London
intellectual going even for self confessed Arty types. Despite the BBC running The Proms these
concerts were not a regular but were occasional items only, mostly on the Home
Service. The BBC in general had been
doing what it wanted and not what we wanted.
This meant
a build up of real resentment against paying the BBC license fee. Had Alex Douglas
Home won the 1964
election by a clear majority, it is possible that there may have been a radical
reform of the BBC and simply it would not have existed in its present form.
Harold
Wilson, we might recall, fawned on The Beatles.
But he was MP for Huyton, a collection of council estates on the edge of
Liverpool and in that period Liverpool itself
had more MP’s than now with a handful of them being marginal seats. I knew his local agent.
The
electoral situation was very tight then and every marginal mattered. Just as Bristol were given airplanes to
build and the West Midlands needed support for the car industry, a Liverpool
going into steep decline needed any media favours it could get. The BBC needed Wilson , he needed them and The Beatles needed
the BBC.
If you want
to know how grim the old BBC TV could be despite all the maudlin claims of some
kind of Golden Age just thumb through the Radio Times of the 1950’s. I did this to check my memory which was that
the BBC programming during that decade was often unwatchable drivel and during
the month of the Coronation of 1953 apart from a handful of highlights was dreadful.
So the BBC
had to do things fast. The Beatles got
the nod and in a break through change for the BBC a featured programme of their
own just when they were making the charts.
With the BBC chasing the “pop”, and sensation market in almost a panic
to survive they needed to hype hard their chosen few as their market leaders. One of them is attracting some rather less
favourable attention at present.
There were
very many good groups in the first years of the 1950’s around at the time
across the country, it was not only Liverpool
that had a thriving pop, jazz, modern and trad’ and folk culture for the
younger age groups. At the turn of the 1950’s
I was into them and well aware that these were a natural development from the
1940’s upheavals in our lives.
If you are
looking for the beginning of the sea change in interests, habits, ideas and the
rest you should begin with the generation of my parents. They were the ones who were hit with the major
American impact in the cinema, dance music, jazz, manners and the idea that
luxury goods could become cheap.
We were
following on, in our own way from those who had gone before in the 1940’s and
1930’s. One critical influence in the
sudden development of this was the million American’s who arrived in the UK during WW2
in the 1940’s. We realised that things
might be very different in real life and not just on film.
For the
Bond films, given the number and variety of Hollywood spectaculars of one sort
or another in the 1950’s, never mind the wilder shores of Hammer films and the
rest, it is difficult to see the first 1962 Bond film as anything other than following
them, but placed in a modern spy genre.
It was a well
financed film, taking advantage of tried but recent techniques and with high
production values, rare to UK
made films. There were technical factors
involved. Stereo sound had arrived with
fuller effects and there was a new generation of cameras.
With big
money and modern logistics it had become possible to do things outside the
studios that would have been simply too expensive before. But the essence and nature of the spectacular
was not new.
Another
change also occurred in the UK . There is an academic theory that points to
times in history when a marked change in the number of young men who are loose
in any society and become free and active has its effects.
This
happened with the end of National Service just before 1962. All those 18 to 21 year olds who might have
been packed off to garrison towns or foreign shores to do their worst (and did)
were now roaming around looking for girls and fun. They were the new market to aim at.
That this
occurred at time when TV went pop and the London
media and fashion lot with the associated big music corporations needed to beef
up sales and marketing meant new imagery and a frantic search to take the lead
in new styling.
I know
people point back to the mid 20th Century when old Etonians ruled
the waves for the Tories and London
intellectuals for the Labour party and claim what happened next was all very
different.
But for
those with rent to pay or mortgages it was another change of the media wall
paper and for those with a job to do or making a career in the outer suburbs or
in the provinces just something on the screens.
Which is
why so many of us preferred to go to the pub.
"Which is why so many of us preferred to go to the pub."
ReplyDeleteYes we did. At least we could have a few beers and a bit of conversation.
and a lot of us left the uk.
ReplyDelete