A couple of
times this blog has referred to the occasion when Her Majesty The Queen visited
The London School of Economics and asked the question about The Crash, “Why did
nobody see it coming?” To which there
came no answer only excuses about things being very complicated.
The truth
was that there were a modest number of critics, doubters and doomsters who had
been deeply concerned about trends but who were either ignored or characterised
as eccentrics or trouble makers.
There were
some at LSE indeed or with connections.
In respect of the Euro end of it the Financial Times has pointed to one
LSE professor and a Belgian, who was very close to the mark in 1998, I repeat,
in 1998.
He was
Professor Paul de Grauwe and there is an item about this which is not too long
with a section in italics which says a great deal:
In other
sources beyond this article it is argued that after the Exchange Rate Monetary
scheme crisis in 1992 it should have been clear to politicians that they had
lost control of the banks and the global markets when it came to complex
finance and the exchanges.
But they
did not learn the lessons and assumed that it was the right political moves and
structures which would solve the problems.
The Euro was devised on this basis.
Yet they are still going on and on attempting to come up with political
notions and structures which would give them control.
These now
go beyond any democratic safeguards or institutions. This is not control by technocrats it is the
attempt to control by the dictatorship of a political caste. This is done by even more complicated and
dictatorial with very expensive structures and turning up the money taps.
And it is
not going to work.
No comments:
Post a Comment