The real
trouble with secondary school examinations is teenagers. I am certain about this because I was once a
teenager and forced to sit examinations.
When I consider my schoolmates and what they were then and have become
since it is problematical how far the examinations we sat were of much use.
The
complaints about the new proposals tabled by Michael Gove often refer to
“putting back the clock 30 years”. But
he cannot do this because the teenagers of today, while similar in some
respects seem to live different lives from those of the early 1980’s and
1970’s. Also, what is proposed is not
the same as the old GCE’s taken by my youngsters in that period.
Also, the
structure of the economy has changed, the pattern and nature of higher
education, the employment prospects and a lot of other things. If the existing system represents a situation
related to the 1980’s, now almost olden times for some, and that was a reformed
and developed pattern from one devised in the 1950’s and 1960’s to meet the
needs of the immediate post war society then perhaps it is time to review
matters.
The real
danger is that the Government may be putting in place a system designed for the
ethos and systems of the first decade of the 21st Century which are
now giving way to another major upheaval in the economy and society. If so we may be going forward but in the wrong
direction.
To deal
with teenagers, if that is possible, one feature of these examinations is that
they occur at a critical stage in the physical, mental, emotional and
intellectual development of the individual.
Given varying rates of these at any particular age and given the
personal experience any judgement made on performance will be provisional and
perhaps a poor long term guide.
Then there
is the question of given the variety and differences whether a single
examination structure is appropriate in a complex world even although the
attempt is made to allow some stratification and quality control in terms of
the needs or interests of both the examinee and whoever is making decisions on
their futures.
Because of
the requirement to be egalitarian and non-judgemental and all that we may be
creating the reverse effect. This is to
push the decision making on the individuals into other areas of activity. There is also the demand that allowances be
made for those whose social position is alleged to work against them.
In the
picture above, from 1933 of a grammar school staff, a number of them will have
studied in different ways before university and may well have taken a range of
examinations to make their academic progress.
They then began to teach for a Schools Certificate which was demanding
and highly selective
For some of
them later in their careers there came the rationalisation and adjustment of
the GCE system, designed to allow greater flexibility and opportunity. Because it seemed to exclude too many other
examinations were created and both them pushed into the single structure
existing system.
What if the
answer for the future might be to have a rather greater variety of forms of
examination, some of which are designed to select and stratify and others to
allow general qualifications with perhaps some clearer direction of purpose.
Or we could
go back even further and have a school leaving age of fourteen with multiple
examination types on offer and ample provision for part time study and self
improvement.
But that
would be much too difficult for a highly centralised government system.
"Or we could go back even further and have a school leaving age of fourteen with multiple examination types on offer and ample provision for part time study and self improvement."
ReplyDeleteI have a suspicion that we really do need to put the clock that far back
With long experience of self, deceased relatives, older relatives, wide age ranges of children and grandchildren, thoroughly agree on first comment. However, would always put a loving family as most important.
Delete