For many
years one of the staple features of international relations has been British
politicians trotting around the world trying to whip up business and while they
are at it lecturing other nations as to how they should run their affairs,
legal systems, methods of election and the rest.
Few teams
of observers at elections in countries whose administrations are suspect in the
handling of the machinery of voting and conduct have been without someone from
Britain preening themselves about the probity and proper ways we have and all
those wonderful traditions and principles.
Looking at
the ongoing situational omnishambles this week in the local elections perhaps
it is time for us to call in experts and advisers from Zimbabwe and
other places to remind us of what we have told them in the past.
The media
does not help. It tells us that there
was a “majority” for this or that. In
truth if only thirty per cent of the electorate voted and the margin was small
then the decision may have been made on the basis of only, say, sixteen per
cent of the electorate. Some
majority.
If the turn
out is even smaller, as it has been in many instances, then it is possible for
a decision to be made by perhaps only one in eight in favour. So where are the rest of them and why are
they not registering their votes?
But it gets
worse and one reason is the slackness of both the actual voting and the postal
votes systems. The first needs an
overhaul on the makeup of electoral registers and identity checking voters. The second is a method of voting wide open to
both manipulation and corrupt practices.
Even the
actual administration of the voting and counting can be suspect or faulty. That the election for the Mayor of London,
just about as high profile as you can get, suffered from significant problems
verging on farce says it all.
It is worse
than that. It is likely that few
electors had much idea about who they were voting for, why and what use these
people are when given any authority.
With the shrinkage of membership of the parties, the detachment of
authority from personal contact with people and the end of real community these
are people who are essentially “others”.
The sheer
confusion of who makes what rules and why with all the agencies, bodies and
quasi-governmental organisations, mostly non elected overlapping, supervising
and very active our local councils are often more post boxes for others and not
an effective or responsible organisation.
Add to that
the effects of the gross centralisation of the Westminster
government in tandem with the flood of regulation, law and directives from Brussels , when you do call
the local Council all they can give is a stream of complicated verbal garbage.
All the
last week has told me is that we do not have a functioning “democracy”, we have
a distorted and damaging electoral system, we have administrations which are
neither reliable nor trustworthy and we have a media that is hopeless and
corrupt.
We have
been here before in many ways. The
picture above is from 1784 and has a reference to Sir Cecil Wray. This was shortly after the Americans had
decided that they did not want London
telling them what to do.
The full
story can be found at:
What
changes? Why bother voting at all?
And another
crisis is due.
No comments:
Post a Comment