A few
months ago on the train we were sitting next to a couple of men, one from Nepal and the other from Alloway, by Ayr in Scotland . The “Cutty Sark” had been in the news and the
Scot was explaining the meaning of the name and the way Robert Burns had told
the tale of Tam O’Shanter and how the ship at Greenwich had come to bear that name.
We did not
say anything it was a private conversation and butting in on others is better
avoided. But it did remind me that there
is much more to the “Cutty Sark” than we think and why she is worth preserving.
In 1869
when “Cutty Sark” was built on the Clyde at Dumbarton, on launching she went
down river for some final work to be done in Greenock . Two of my Great Great Grandfathers were
resident there with their families, one a ships carpenter, born in Leith in
1815 and the other an iron worker born in Ayr in 1808 who married in Paisley . “Harn” is
a word for coarse linens, a fabric much used by the lower classes.
Did either
of them put in some work on the ship? Given
the number of other family connections, I like to think that someone did. Given their home addresses adjacent to the
docks and yards they could hardly avoid seeing her or marvelling at her
construction.
One
researcher has produced a book of the crew lists that could be found and I must
try to find a copy to pore down the lists of names. The chances are against it but there might be
just one of the extended families who sailed on her.
Given the
number of men who did work on the vessel in construction originally and later
or sailed with her on the many voyages, there must be quite a number of people
around the world with a connection. In
my own case I know them to be scattered around the UK
and inevitably in Australia ,
New Zealand , Canada and the USA .
It is
possible to complain that the work and events down the years have meant that
what is left of the original “Cutty Sark” is limited. But it was a working ship and the ropes, the
sails and a lot else have to be changed.
The wear and tear of service inevitably meant reworking and
replacements.
But the
survival of what we have tells us of the incredible skills and strengths of the
men who built and sailed her and something of the abilities of our past
generations. Above all she was a
merchant ship manned by ordinary men for ordinary trading purposes.
Now she is
a tourist attraction located on The Thames and will never sail again. Moreover, her survival in part is due to
Royal interest and persistence in wanting her to survive. The Duke of Edinburgh was a naval man and his
body language never lets us forget it.
Soon we
will go up to see her again in the new guise and with the new facilities and
all the rest. It will be a day, I hope
with a stiff Sou’ Wester, wet and with the white flecks on the waves of the Thames to give a taste of reality.
But if only
she could sail again.
No comments:
Post a Comment